NUMBER 13-13-00011-CR
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
JOSE GONZALES III, Appellant,
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.
On appeal from the 105th District Court
of Nueces County, Texas.
ORDER
Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza
Order Per Curiam
This cause is before the Court on appellant's pro se “Motion to Hold Appeal in
Abeyance Pending Disposition of Appeal Attorney or Court Allowing Appellant to File Pro
Se.” Appellant’s counsel filed an Anders brief in this cause. See Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967); Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 825 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).
Pro se appellant’s brief is currently due on October 4, 2013, but appellant asserts that he
has not been provided with the opportunity to review the record of this cause. The Court,
having examined and fully considered appellant’s motion, is of the opinion that it should
be granted in part and denied in part. The motion is GRANTED insofar as it is hereby
ORDERED that the trial court ensure that appellant has the opportunity to fully examine
the appellate record on or before the expiration of twenty-one days from the date of this
order, and it is FURTHER ORDERED that the trial court notify this Court as to the date
upon which the appellate record was made available to appellant. Appellant shall have
thirty (30) days from the day the appellate record was first made available to him to file his
pro se brief with this Court. The motion is DENIED in all other respects.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
PER CURIAM
Do not publish.
TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
Delivered and filed the
7th day of October, 2013.
2