Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-14-00029-CR
Kimberly Ann RANGEL,
Appellant
v.
The STATE of Texas,
Appellee
From the 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas
Trial Court No. 11-2315-CR
Honorable William D. Old, III, Judge Presiding
Opinion by: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice
Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice
Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
Delivered and Filed: November 12, 2014
AFFIRMED; MOTION TO WITHDRAW GRANTED
Kimberly Ann Rangel pled guilty to forgery of a financial instrument and received deferred
adjudication community supervision for a term of four years on March 20, 2012. On August 5,
2013, the State filed a motion to adjudicate guilt and revoke her community supervision alleging
that Rangel had violated multiple conditions of her community supervision, including failing to
report to her probation officer on ten separate occasions (Condition No. 6), failing to timely notify
her probation officer of a change in her employment status (Condition No. 7), failing to obtain
written permission before leaving Guadalupe County on two occasions (Condition No. 11), failing
04-14-00029-CR
to pay fines, costs and fees (Condition Nos. 12, 13 15, 16, 21), failing to timely notify her probation
officer of a change in residence (Condition No. 20), failing to perform community service
restitution hours as scheduled (Condition No. 24), and failing to enroll in assigned classes
(Condition Nos. 28, 30). An amended motion filed by the State on October 17, 2013 alleged that
Rangel also violated Condition No. 1 by committing the offense of assault/bodily injury—family.
At the hearing, Rangel pled “true” to all of the alleged violations. The trial court adjudicated
Rangel guilty and revoked her community supervision. The court sentenced Rangel to eighteen
months’ imprisonment in a state jail facility and assessed $245 in court costs. Rangel now appeals.
We affirm the trial court’s judgment.
Rangel’s court-appointed appellate attorney filed a brief containing a professional
evaluation of the record in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and a
motion to withdraw. In the brief, counsel raises no arguable appellate issues, and concludes this
appeal is frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the Anders requirements. See id.; see also
High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex.
Crim. App. 1969). As required, counsel provided Rangel with a copy of the brief and motion to
withdraw, and informed her of her right to review the record and file her own pro se brief. See
Nichols v. State, 954 S.W.2d 83, 85-86 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1997, no pet.); see also Bruns
v. State, 924 S.W.2d 176, 177 n.1 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1996, no pet.). Rangel did not file a
pro se brief.
After reviewing the record and counsel’s brief, we conclude there is no reversible error and
agree with counsel that the appeal is wholly frivolous. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826-
27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. See id.
Appellate counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted. Nichols, 954 S.W.2d at 86; Bruns, 924 S.W.2d
at 177 n.1.
-2-
04-14-00029-CR
No substitute counsel will be appointed. Should Rangel wish to seek further review of this
case by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, she must either retain an attorney to file a petition
for discretionary review or must file a pro se petition for discretionary review. Any petition for
discretionary review must be filed within thirty days from the date of either this opinion or the last
timely motion for rehearing that is overruled by this court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 68.2. Any petition
for discretionary review must be filed with this court, after which it will be forwarded to the Texas
Court of Criminal Appeals along with the rest of the filings in this case. See TEX. R. APP. P. 68.3.
Any petition for discretionary review must comply with the requirements of Rule 68.4 of the Texas
Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 68.4.
Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice
DO NOT PUBLISH
-3-