Jorge Maximo Espinoza v. State

` NUMBER 13-13-00251-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG IN RE THE GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY AND GOODYEAR-DUNLOP TIRES NORTH AMERICA, LTD. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Rodriguez, Garza and Perkes Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam On May 13, 2013, relators, the Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company and Goodyear-Dunlop Tires North America, Ltd., filed a petition for writ of mandamus contending that the Honorable Jack Marr, presiding judge of the 24th Judicial District Court of Calhoun County, Texas, abused his discretion, leaving relators without an adequate appellate remedy, by rendering certain discovery orders on March 28, 2013. Relators also filed a motion for temporary relief in which they asked this Court to impose a stay on the underlying proceedings until such time as we may fully consider the petition for writ of mandamus. On May 14, 2013, we granted relators’ motion for temporary relief and ordered the real parties in interest to file any response to the petition for writ of mandamus. Responses were filed on May 29 and May 30, 2013. Having reviewed relators’ petition for writ of mandamus, the responses filed thereto, and the record documents provided by the parties, this Court is of the opinion that relators have not shown themselves entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, we hereby DENY relators’ petition for writ of mandamus and LIFT the previously-imposed stay on trial court proceedings. PER CURIAM Delivered and filed the 26th day of July, 2013. 2