Order entered November 5, 2013
In The
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-12-01536-CR
MOISE MARTINEZ, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 7
Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. F-1162885-Y
ORDER
On June 5, 2012, we ordered the Dallas County District Clerk to prepare and file a
supplemental clerk’s record containing a detailed itemization of the costs assessed in this case,
including but not limited to, specific court costs, fees, and court appointed attorney fees.
However, the detailed itemization of costs included in the supplemental clerk’s record does not
comply with the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. arts.
103.001, 103.006 (West 2006).
Accordingly, we ORDER the Dallas County District Clerk to file, within seven days of
the date of this order, a second supplemental clerk’s record that contains a detailed itemization of
the costs assessed in this case that complies with articles 103.001 and 103.006 of the Texas Code
of Criminal Procedure. See id. art. 103.001 (“A cost is not payable by the person charged with
the cost until a written bill is produced or is ready to be produced, containing the items of cost,
signed by the officer who charged the cost or the officer who is entitled to receive payment for
the cost.”) (emphasis added); id. art. 103.006 (“If a criminal action or proceeding . . . is appealed,
an officer of the court shall certify and sign a bill of costs stating the costs that have accrued and
send the bill of costs to the court to which the action or proceeding is . . . appealed.”) (emphasis
added).
/s/ JIM MOSELEY
PRESIDING JUSTICE