in Re: Jimmy Ray Adams

Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
Date filed: 2010-05-12
Citations:
Copy Citations
Click to Find Citing Cases
Combined Opinion
NO

NO. 12-10-00096-CR

 

                         IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

 

            TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

 

                                      TYLER, TEXAS

                                                                             '    

IN RE: JIMMY RAY ADAMS,

RELATOR                                                          '     ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

 

                                                                             '    

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION

            In this original proceeding, Jimmy Ray Adams seeks a writ of mandamus requiring Barbara Duncan, District Clerk of Gregg County, Texas, to provide him a copy of the written plea admonishments in trial court cause number 19549-B in accordance with the trial court’s order dated March 6, 2007. 

            This court has the authority to issue writs of mandamus against a judge of a district or county court in its appellate district and all writs necessary to enforce this court’s jurisdiction.  See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221 (Vernon 2004).  In order for this court to issue mandamus against a district clerk, it must be established that issuance of the writ of mandamus is necessary to enforce its jurisdiction.  See id.; In re Coronado, 980 S.W.2d 691, 692-93 (Tex. App.–San Antonio 1998, orig. proceeding).  Here, Adams seeks the requested document in connection with his postconviction writ of habeas corpus.  This court has no jurisdiction in criminal law matters pertaining to habeas corpus proceedings seeking relief from final felony judgments.  That jurisdiction lies exclusively with the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals.  Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.07 § 3 (Vernon Supp. 2009).  Consequently, Adams has not demonstrated that the exercise of this court’s mandamus authority against the Gregg County District Clerk is necessary to enforce its jurisdiction.  Accordingly, his petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed.

                                                                                                     BRIAN HOYLE__   

                                                                                                              Justice

 

Opinion delivered May 12, 2010.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

 

(DO NOT PUBLISH)