NUMBER 13-12-00332-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
____________________________________________________________
SAN JACINTO TITLE SERVICES OF
RIO GRANDE VALLEY, LLC, APPELLANT,
v.
POCO MAS, LTD AND POCO MAS GRANDE, LTD., APPELLEES.
____________________________________________________________
On appeal from the 92nd District Court
of Hidalgo County, Texas.
____________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Garza and Vela
Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
The parties to this appeal have filed a joint motion to dismiss pursuant to
settlement. The parties request this Court enter judgment vacating the trial court’s
judgment and dismissing the cause with prejudice. The Court has considered the motion
and it is the Court=s opinion that the motion should be GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED
IN PART.1 Accordingly, without regard to the merits, we VACATE the judgment as to
appellant, San Jacinto Title Services of Rio Grande Valley, LLC2, and REMAND the case
to the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the parties= settlement
agreement. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2)(B); 43.2(d). In accordance with the
agreement of the parties, costs are taxed against the party incurring same. See TEX. R.
APP. P. 42.1(d).
PER CURIAM
Delivered and filed the
29th day of August, 2012.
1
Rule 42.1(a)(2) permits the Court to render judgment effectuating the parties= agreements or to vacate
the trial court=s judgment and remand the case to the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the
agreement; we cannot do both. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2)(A),(B).
2
Britt Massie did not perfect an appeal. Therefore, the judgment against Britt Massie and in favor of San
Jacinto Title Services of Rio Grande Valley, LLC remains in full force and effect.
2