Leslie Hemphill v. State of Texas

Opinions filed March 17, 2011

 

                                                                       In The

                                                                             

  Eleventh Court of Appeals

                                                                   __________

 

                                    Nos. 11-11-00021-CR & 11-11-00022-CR

                                                    __________

 

                                   LESLIE HEMPHILL, Appellant

 

                                                             V.

 

                                      STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

 

                                  On Appeal from the 272nd District Court

 

                                                           Brazos County, Texas

 

                       Trial Court Cause Nos. 06-02012-CRF-272 & 06-05077-CRF-272

 

 

                                            M E M O R A N D U M   O P I N I O N

 

            In both causes, Leslie Hemphill was convicted in 2006 for the delivery of a controlled substance.  On July 23, 2010, in trial court cause no. 06-02012-CRF-272, Hemphill filed a motion requesting additional credit for time that he spent in jail.  The trial court entered an order in that cause on September 30, 2010, denying Hemphill’s motion.  Hemphill subsequently filed a notice of appeal, containing both cause numbers, in which he is attempting to appeal from the “order signed by the trial court on 09/30/2010, denying defendant’s Motion Requesting Additional Time Credit.”  The State has filed in each case a motion to dismiss for want of jurisdiction.  We dismiss the appeals.

            After the clerk’s records were received by this court, we wrote Hemphill on February 14, 2011, and informed him that it did not appear that we had jurisdiction in either case.  We requested Hemphill to respond in writing by March 1, 2011, and show grounds to continue these appeals.  Hemphill has not filed a response showing grounds to continue; he did contact the district clerk’s office and request that the September 30, 2010 order and the motion requesting additional jail credit be forwarded to this court.  The clerk’s records that had been previously filed already contained those documents.  The September 30, 2010 order from which Hemphill attempts to appeal is, however, not an appealable order.  See Ex parte Forooghi, 185 S.W.3d 498 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006); Ex parte Ybarra, 149 S.W.3d 147 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004); Everett v. State, 82 S.W.3d 735 (Tex. App.—Waco 2002, pet. dismissed).  Consequently, we have no jurisdiction to entertain these appeals.

            The State’s motions to dismiss are granted, and the appeals are dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

           

 

                                                                                                PER CURIAM

 

March 17, 2011

Do not publish.  See Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

Panel consists of:  Wright, C.J.,

McCall, J., and Strange, J.