United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT April 10, 2003
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 02-30894
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
RHONDA RENEE ROTH,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Louisiana
(99-CR-20078-1)
--------------------
Before DAVIS, WIENER, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Defendant-Appellant Rhonda Renee Roth pleaded guilty to theft
of mail, a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1708, and was sentenced to
probation. Roth appeals her sentence following the district
court’s revocation of probation.
Roth contends that the district court’s sentence of two years’
imprisonment was plainly unreasonable. Roth has not shown
that her sentence was illegal or unreasonable. See United States
v. Pena, 125 F.3d 285, 287 (5th Cir. 1997). Roth also argues that
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
the district court erred by sentencing her in excess of her
original guidelines sentencing range. This argument is, as she
concedes, foreclosed by our precedent. See id.
The judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED.
2