in Re: Senrick Wilkerson

Deny Writ and Opinion Filed August 30, 2013 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-13-01133-CV No. 05-13-01134-CV IN RE SENRICK WILKERSON, Relator On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 3 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause Nos. W10-01183-J, W10-01184-J MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices FitzGerald, Lang, and Myers Opinion by Justice FitzGerald The Court has before it relator’s “Order for Hearing to Show Proof of Fraud, Tampering with Government Documents and Illegal Convictions.” We treat this document as a petition for writ of mandamus. The facts and issues are well known to the parties, so we need not recount them herein. Based on the record before us, we conclude relator has not shown he is entitled to the relief requested. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a); Simon v. Levario, 306 S.W.3d 318, 320-21 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009) (orig. proceeding); State of Tex. ex rel. Hill v. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Dist., 34 S.W.3d 924, 927 (Tex. Crim. App. 2001) (orig. proceeding). Accordingly, we DENY relator=s petition for writ of mandamus. /Kerry P. FitzGerald/ 131133F.P05 KERRY P. FITZGERALD JUSTICE