Robert Martinez, Jr. v. State

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-14-00266-CR Robert MARTINEZ, Jr., Appellant v. The STATE of The STATE of Texas, Appellee From the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2013CR4546 Honorable Maria Teresa Herr, Judge Presiding PER CURIAM Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Delivered and Filed: June 18, 2014 DISMISSED On May 22, 2014, this court issued an order stating this appeal would be dismissed pursuant to Rule 25.2(d) unless an amended trial court certification that shows appellant has the right of appeal was made part of the appellate record on or before June 23, 2014. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d), 37.1; see also Daniels v. State, 110 S.W.3d 174, 175-76 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2003, order). Appellant’s counsel filed a response in which he states that he has reviewed the clerk’s record and “can find no right of appeal” for appellant; counsel concedes that the appeal must be dismissed. In light of the record presented, we agree with appellant’s counsel that Rule 25.2(d) 04-14-00266-CR requires this court to dismiss this appeal. TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d). The record does not contain a certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal; to the contrary, the trial court certification in the record states “this criminal case is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” The clerk’s record contains a written plea bargain, and the punishment assessed did not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant; therefore, the clerk’s record supports the trial court’s certification that the defendant has no right of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d). PER CURIAM Do not publish -2-