NO. 07-11-00405-CR
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
AT AMARILLO
PANEL A
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MAY 2, 2012
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
KELVIN OLIVER AKA KEVIN OLIVER, APPELLANT
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FROM THE 361ST DISTRICT COURT OF BRAZOS COUNTY;
NO. 09-01849-CRF-361; HONORABLE STEVEN LEE SMITH, JUDGE
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Before CAMPBELL and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On August 9, 2011, appellant Kelvin Oliver a/k/a Kevin Oliver was convicted of theft of property of less than $1,500. He received a sentence, enhanced by prior convictions, of four and one-half years confinement in prison. Appellant filed a notice of appeal on September 2, 2011. Through orders of September 7, 2011, the trial court released appellant on an appeal bond with the condition he report weekly to the probation department.
By motion filed April 16, 2012, the State seeks involuntary dismissal of the appeal, asserting appellant has escaped from custody. In an attached affidavit of February 29, 2012, appellant's surety states that appellant posted an appeal bond of $50,000 on September 9, 2011, and was released. The surety further states appellant could not be located after January 19, 2012, and appellant did not report according to the terms of the bond agreement. The surety's affidavit speaks also of the inability of appellant's family members to find him since late January. In a March 19, 2012, affidavit also attached, a representative of the county sheriff's office states that the office has no record that appellant has been "back in custody" of the Brazos County sheriff since his September 9, 2011 release. According to a certified copy of an April 4, 2012 judgment nisi attached to the State's motion, appellant did not appear for a hearing on March 9, 2012. The judgment also orders appellant's bond forfeited and sets the amount of bail required on re-arrest.
Appellate Rule 42.4 provides:
The appellate court must dismiss an appeal on the State's motion, supported by affidavit, showing that the appellant has escaped from custody pending the appeal and that to the affiant's knowledge, the appellant has not, within ten days after escaping, voluntarily returned to lawful custody within the state.
Tex. R. App. P. 42.4. We have previously held that "escape from custody" as contemplated by Rule 42.4 includes absconding while released on appeal bond. Porras v. State, 966 S.W.2d 764, 765 (Tex.App.--Amarillo 1998, no pet.). Here, we are shown by the State's motion that appellant escaped from custody during the pendency of his appeal and did not voluntarily return to lawful custody in Texas within ten days of escaping. As noted, appellant made no response to the State's motion. We grant the State's motion and dismiss the appeal. Tex. R. App. P. 42.4.
James T. Campbell
Justice
Do not publish.