Commerce and Industry Insurance Company Starnet Insurance Company Catlin Insurance Company, Inc. Allianz Global Corporate & Specialty S.E. United States Aircraft Insurance Group And QBE Aviation Syndicate 5555 at Lloyd's v. American Jet International Corporation D/B/A Million Air Charter, Rew Investments, Inc., Houston Aviation Partners, LLC, Woolsey Aviation, Inc., Million Air Lackland, LLC, Go Fayetteville, LLC, Reno Aviation Partners, LLC, Gulfport Aviation Partners, LLC

Summarize
Check Treatment
                                                COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE
                                           FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

                                                     ORDER ON MOTION

Cause number:                     01-14-00488-CV
Style:                            Commerce and Industry Insurance Company; Starnet Insurance Company; Catlin Insurance
                                  Company, Inc.; Allianz Global Corporate & Specialty S.E.; United States Aircraft Insurance
                                  Group; and QBE Aviation Syndicate 5555 at Lloyd’s v. American Jet International
                                  Corporation d/b/a Million Air Charter; REW Investments, Inc.; Houston Aviation Partners,
                                  LLC; Woolsey Aviation, Inc.; Million Air Lackland, LLC; Go Fayetteville, LLC; Reno
                                  Aviation Partners, LLC; Gulfport Aviation Partners, LLC; Tallahassee Aviation Partners,
                                  LLC; Million Air Interlink, Inc.; Roger Woolsey; and Carl Moody
Date motion filed:                July 8, 2014
Type of motion:                   Unopposed motion for extension of time to file response to petitions for permissive appeal
Party filing motion:              Torus National Insurance Company
Document to be filed:             Response to American Jet International Corporation d/b/a Million Air Charter, et al.’s
                                  Petition for Permissive Appeal and Response to Carl Moody’s Petition for Permissive
                                  Appeal


Ordered that motion is:

                  Granted
                    If documents are to be filed, documents due: July 23, 2014
                             Absent extraordinary circumstances, the Court will not grant additional motions to extend time.
                   Denied
          Dismissed
          Other: _____________________________________




Judge’s signature: /s/ Jim Sharp
                   

Panel consists of       ____________________________________________

Date: July 15, 2014



November 7, 2008 Revision