NUMBERS 13-11-00252-CR AND 13-11-00253-CR
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
ANGELA ZANEIS A/K/A ANGELA HALE, Appellant,
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.
On appeal from the 28th District Court
of Nueces County, Texas.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Benavides, Vela, and Perkes
Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
Appellant, Angela Zaneis a/k/a Angela Hale, attempts to appeal convictions for
possession of methamphetamine. The trial court has certified in both cases that this Ais
a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.@ See TEX. R. APP. P.
25.2(a)(2).
On July 12, 2011, this Court notified appellant=s counsel of the trial court=s
certifications and ordered counsel to: (1) review the record; (2) determine whether
appellant has a right to appeal; and (3) forward to this Court, by letter, counsel=s findings
as to whether appellant has a right to appeal, or, alternatively, advise this Court as to the
existence of any amended certifications.
On August 2, 2011, counsel filed a letter brief with this Court. Counsel=s response
does not establish that the certifications currently on file with this Court are incorrect or
that appellant otherwise has a right to appeal.
The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provide that an appeal must be
dismissed if the trial court=s certification does not show that the defendant has the right of
appeal. TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d); see TEX. R. APP. P. 37.1, 44.3, 44.4. Accordingly, these
appeals are DISMISSED. Appellant counsel’s motions to withdraw, previously carried
with the case, are GRANTED.
PER CURIAM
Do not publish.
TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
Delivered and filed the
29th day of August, 2011.
2