Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Nos. 04-14-00148-CR & 04-14-00149-CR
Charles Ray PRINGLER,
Appellant
v.
The STATE of
The STATE of Texas,
Appellee
From the 226th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
Trial Court Nos. 2013CR7950 & 2013CR7951
Honorable Sid L. Harle, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice
Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
Delivered and Filed: May 21, 2014
DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION
On February 27, 2014, Appellant Charles Pringler was convicted of the offense of
possession of a controlled substance in cause number 2013-CR-7950 and escape from a
correctional facility in cause number 2013-CR-7951. The jury assessed punishment, respectively,
at five years and nine years confinement in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of
Criminal Justice. Appellate counsel was appointed in both cases on February 28, 2014. The record
does not contain a written notice of appeal. Although the record indicates that Pringler gave oral
04-14-00148-CR & 04-14-00149-CR
notice of appeal in open court, Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.2(c) requires the notice “be
given in writing and filed with the trial court clerk.” TEX. R. APP. PROC. 25.2(c).
On April 22, 2014, this court ordered Appellant to show cause as to why this appeal should
not be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. On May 6, 2014, appellate counsel filed a response
requesting this court construe the trial court’s hand-written notation “Oral Notice of Appeal given
in open court on record, by pro se Defendant” as written notice of appeal. The trial court’s note
was located on the trial court’s docket statement dated February 27, 2014. Texas Rule of Appellate
Procedure 25.2(c)(1) requires “Notice be given in writing and filed with the trial court.” TEX. R.
APP. P. 25.2(c)(1). We decline to construe the trial court’s written comments regarding an oral
request by a defendant as written notification. Id.
Absent a timely-filed, written notice of appeal of a criminal conviction, this court lacks
jurisdiction over the appeal. Olivo, 918 S.W.2d at 522 (“A timely notice of appeal is necessary to
invoke a court of appeals’ jurisdiction.”); Shute v. State, 744 S.W.2d 96, 97 (Tex. Crim. App.
1988).
This appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
PER CURIAM
DO NOT PUBLISH
-2-
Charles Ray Pringler v. State
Combined Opinion