|
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
|
NO. 02-13-00045-CR
|
Adan Martinez
v.
The State of Texas |
§
§
§
§
§ |
From the 371st District Court
of Tarrant County (1219208D)
March 14, 2013
Per Curiam
(nfp) |
JUDGMENT
This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that the appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS
PER CURIAM
|
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
|
NO. 02-13-00045-CR
|
Adan Martinez |
|
APPELLANT |
|
V.
|
||
|
The State of Texas |
|
STATE |
----------
FROM THE 371st District Court OF Tarrant COUNTY
----------
MEMORANDUM OPINION[1]
----------
Adan Martinez attempts to appeal from his conviction and fifteen-year sentence for aggravated kidnapping.
The trial court sentenced appellant on October 17, 2011. Because appellant did not file a motion for new trial, his notice of appeal was due November 16, 2011. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1). Appellant did not file a notice of appeal until February 1, 2013 (which he mailed on January 28, 2013). We have received no response to our February 5, 2013 inquiry regarding jurisdiction.
Because appellant did not timely invoke the jurisdiction of this court,[2] we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f); Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522–23 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996).
PER CURIAM
PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; DAUPHINOT and GARDNER, JJ.
DO NOT PUBLISH
Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)
DELIVERED: March 14, 2013
[1]See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
[2]Even if appellant’s notice of appeal had been timely, the trial court’s certification of his right to appeal correctly states that this “is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2), (d).