Ruby Lucille Hall v. RDSL Enterprises LLC D/B/A Jack in the Box

02-12-363-CV


COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

 

 

 

NO. 02-12-00363-CV

 

 

Ruby Lucille Hall

 

APPELLANT

 

V.

 

RDSL Enterprises LLC d/b/a Jack in the Box, and Jack in the Box, Inc.

 

APPELLEES

 

 

------------

 

FROM THE 141st District Court OF Tarrant COUNTY

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION[1] AND JUDGMENT

------------

 

We have considered “Appellant's Motion To Dismiss All Claims Against Jack In The Box, Inc.”  It is the court’s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal against Jack in the Box, Inc. only.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).  This case shall hereafter be styled Ruby Lucille Hall v. RDSL Enterprises LLC d/b/a Jack in the Box.

          Costs of the appeal shall be paid by appellant, for which let execution issue.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).

 

                                                                             PER CURIAM

PANEL:  MEIER, GARDNER, and GABRIEL, JJ. 

 

DELIVERED:  February 14, 2013


 



[1]See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.