Opinion issued April 10, 2014
In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas
————————————
NO. 01-14-00060-CR
———————————
VAN WATSON, JR., Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 180th District Court
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 699312
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant, Van Watson, Jr., pleaded guilty to the felony offense of
aggravated sexual assault of a child and the trial court sentenced appellant to thirty
years’ confinement. See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 22.021 (West Supp. 2013); see
also In re Watson, No. 01-11-00626-CR, 2011 WL 3820953, at *1 (Tex. App.—
Houston [1st Dist.] Aug. 25, 2011, orig. proceeding) (mem. op., not designated for
publication) (noting that appellant was convicted of felony offense of sexual
assault of a child). Appellant later filed a “motion for nunc pro tunc to correct
judgment and sentence.” The trial court denied the motion and appellant now
attempts to appeal from the trial court’s order denying his motion for judgment
nunc pro tunc. We dismiss the appeal.
The denial of a motion for judgment nunc pro tunc is not an appealable
order. See Lozano v. State, No. 01-13-00180-CR, 2013 WL 2106570, at *1 (Tex.
App.—Houston [1st Dist.] May 14, 2013, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for
publication); Zelaya v. State, Nos. 01-11-00977-CR, 01-11-00978-CR, 01-11-
00979-CR, 2013 WL 127439, at *1 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] Jan. 10, 2013,
no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication); Everett v. State, 82 S.W.3d
735, 735 (Tex. App.—Waco 2002, pet. dism’d).
Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R.
APP. P. 43.2(f). We dismiss any pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Higley, and Sharp.
Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
2