Jermaine Cotton v. State

Order entered June 18, 2013 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-12-01724-CR No. 05-12-01731-CR No. 05-12-01732-CR JERMAINE COTTON, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 363rd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause Nos. F12-51603-W, F12-51604-W, F12-70036-W ORDER Appellant’s brief is overdue in these appeals. We also note that none of the boxes is checked on the trial court’s certifications of appellant’s right to appeal these cases. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why appellant’s brief has not been filed. In this regard, the trial court shall make appropriate findings and recommendations and determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeals, whether appellant is indigent, or if not indigent, whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeals. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b). If the trial court cannot obtain appellant’s presence at the hearing, the trial court shall conduct the hearing in appellant’s absence. See Meza v. State, 742 S.W.2d 708 (Tex. App.–Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (per curiam). If appellant is indigent, the trial court is ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective representation, which may include appointment of new counsel. We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which shall include written findings and recommendations, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order. We further ORDER that the supplemental clerk’s records contain completed copies of the trial court’s certifications of appellant’s right to appeal in these cases. The appeals are ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above order. The appeals shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are received, whichever is earlier. /s/ DAVID EVANS JUSTICE