Rigo Guerra v. State

The State of TexasAppellee Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas March 6, 2014 No. 04-13-00395-CR Rigo GUERRA, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee From the 81st Judicial District Court, La Salle County, Texas Trial Court No. 11-09-00042-CRL Honorable Donna S. Rayes, Judge Presiding ORDER Appellant’s brief was originally due to be filed on November 18, 2013. Appellant’s first motion requesting an extension of time to file the brief was granted, extending the deadline for filing the brief to December 18, 2013. On December 27, 2013, the appellant filed a motion requesting an additional extension of time to file the brief until January 17, 2014, for a total extension of sixty days. By order dated December 30, 2013, the motion was granted. The order stated that appellant’s brief must be filed by January 14, 2014. The motion further stated, “THIS IS THE FINAL EXTENSION OF TIME THAT THE APPELLANT WILL BE GRANTED.” The brief was not filed by the January 14, 2014. On January 21, 2014, this court issued an additional order extending the deadline for filing the brief to January 27, 2014. The order stated that if the brief was not filed by January 27, 2014, this appeal would be abated to the trial court for an abandonment hearing, and the trial court would be asked to consider whether sanctions are appropriate against appellant’s attorney. TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b)(2). The brief was not filed by January 27, 2014. On February 4, 2014, we abated this appeal to the trial court for an abandonment hearing, requesting the trial court to conduct a hearing and file supplemental records by March 6, 2014. A copy of this order is attached to this order. On March 5, 2014, the trial court filed a motion requesting an extension of time to conduct the hearing, stating the hearing will be held on March 14, 2014. Despite this court’s February 4, 2014 order abating this appeal for an abandonment hearing, appellant’s attorney filed a motion to abate this appeal on February 27, 2014, stating that the appellate record is incomplete with regard to a hearing conducted in the underlying cause on March 14, 2013. Appellant’s attorney further states, however, that he has been unsuccessful in contacting the court reporter to determine the availability of the record which might also require the entry of findings of fact and conclusions of law by the trial court. A copy of this motion is attached to this order. The trial court’s motion requesting an extension of time is GRANTED. The trial court is ORDERED to file supplemental clerk’s and reporter’s records in this court, no later than March 21, 2014, which must include: 1. a transcription of the hearing and copies of any documentary evidence admitted; 2. written findings of fact and conclusions of law; 3. recommendations addressing the questions enumerated in the February 4, 2014 order; and 4. recommendations regarding the issues raised by appellant’s attorney in his February 27, 2014 motion with respect to the availability of a record in the underlying cause from a March 14, 2013 hearing and findings of fact and conclusions of law pertinent to the appellant’s statement or confession. _________________________________ Catherine Stone, Chief Justice IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 6th day of March, 2014. ___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court The State of TexasAppellee Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas February 4, 2014 No. 04-13-00395-CR Rigo GUERRA, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee From the 81st Judicial District Court, La Salle County, Texas Trial Court No. 11-09-00042-CRL Honorable Donna S. Rayes, Judge Presiding ORDER Appellant’s brief was originally due to be filed on November 18, 2013. Appellant’s first motion requesting an extension of time to file the brief was granted, extending the deadline for filing the brief to December 18, 2013. On December 27, 2013, the appellant filed a motion requesting an additional extension of time to file the brief until January 17, 2014, for a total extension of sixty days. By order dated December 30, 2013, the motion was granted. The order stated that appellant’s brief must be filed by January 14, 2014. The motion further stated, “THIS IS THE FINAL EXTENSION OF TIME THAT THE APPELLANT WILL BE GRANTED.” The brief was not filed by the January 14, 2014. On January 21, 2014, this court issued an additional order extending the deadline for filing the brief to January 27, 2014. The order stated that if the brief was not filed by January 27, 2014, this appeal would be abated to the trial court for an abandonment hearing, and the trial court would be asked to consider whether sanctions were appropriate against appellant’s attorney. TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b)(2). The brief was not filed by January 27, 2014. Pursuant to rule 38.8(b)(2) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, we abate this case to the trial court and ORDER the trial court to conduct a hearing to answer the following questions: (1) Does appellant desire to prosecute his appeal? (2) Is appellant indigent? If appellant is indigent, the trial court shall take such measures as may be necessary to assure the effective assistance of counsel, which may include the appointment of new counsel. (3) Has appointed or retained counsel abandoned the appeal? Because sanctions may be necessary, the trial court should address this issue even if new counsel is retained or substituted before the date of the hearing. The trial court may, in its discretion, receive evidence on the first two questions by sworn affidavit from the appellant. The trial court shall, however, order the appellant’s counsel to be present at the hearing. The trial court is further ORDERED to file supplemental clerk’s and reporter’s records in this court, no later than March 6, 2014, which shall include: (1) a transcription of the hearing and copies of any documentary evidence admitted, (2) written findings of fact and conclusions of law, and (3) recommendations addressing the above enumerated questions. _________________________________ Catherine Stone, Chief Justice IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 4th day of February, 2014. ___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court ACCEPTED 04-13-00395-CR FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 2/27/2014 5:07:41 PM KEITH HOTTLE CLERK NO.  04-­‐13-­‐00395-­‐CR       FILED IN RIGO  GUERRA,         §        IN  THE  COURT  4th OF  A PPEALS   COURT OF APPEALS   Appellant   SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS   02/27/2014 5:07:41 PM vs.             §          FOURTH  DISTRICT   OF  TEXAS   KEITH E. HOTTLE   Clerk   THE  STATE  OF  TEXAS         §        SAN  ANTONIO,  TEXAS       APPELLANT’S  MOTION  TO  ABATE  APPEAL   FOR  ENTRY  OF  FINDINGS  OF  FACT  AND  CONCLUSIONS   OF  LAW  RELATING  TO  THE  APPELLANT’S  PRE-­‐TRIAL   MOTION  TO  SUPPRESS  EVIDENCE  OF  THE  APPELLANT’S   STATEMENT/CONFESSION     TO  THE  HONORABLE  COURT  OFAPPEALS:       Now  comes,  Rigo  Guerra,  appellant  in  the  instant  cause  and  files  this   “Appellant’s  Motion  to  Abate  Appeal  for  Entry  of  Findings  of  Fact  and  Conclusions  of   Law  Relating  to  the  Appellant’s  Pre-­‐Trial  Motion  to  Suppress  Evidence  of  the   Appellant’s  Statement/Confession.    In  support  of  the  motion  the  appellant  would   show  unto  the  Court  the  following:     A.     The  appellant  is  presently  appealing  his  conviction  for  the  offense  of  Capital   Murder  arising  out  of  LaSalle  County  wherein  he  was  convicted  and  sentenced  to   Life  in  confinement  in  the  Texas  Department  of  Criminal  Justice.         B.     The  record  of  the  trial  along  with  the  clerk’s  record  has  been  filed  in  this   Court  and  the  matter  is  pending  of  the  appellant’s  brief  in  this  Court  by  the   undersigned.    A  review  of  the  record  has  revealed  that  a  portion  of  the  record  is  not   presently  before  the  Court.    That  portion  of  the  record  is  essential  to  an  adequate   presentation  of  the  appellant’s  allegations  of  error.   C.     The  record  reflects  that  prior  to  trial  appellant’s  trial  counsel  filed  a  written   “Motion  To  Determine  Admissibility  of  Written  Or  Oral  Statements  of  Defendant   Outside  The  Presence  of  Jury”.  (C.R.1-­‐107)  The  trial  Court’s  docket  sheet  reflects   that  a  hearing  was  conducted  on  that  motion  on  March  14,  2013.  The  court   reporter’s  record  that  has  been  forwarded  to  this  Court  does  not  contain  a  record  of   that  hearing.      The  reporter’s  record  filed  with  this  Court  consists  of  the  record  of   the  trial  starting  on  May  6,  2013  with  the  jury  voir  dire  process  and  concludes  with   the  jury’s  verdict  returned  on  May  15,  2013.    The  undersigned  has  completed  a   review  of  that  record  and  has  been  unable  to  locate  a  record  of  the  hearing  on  the   appellant’s  pre-­‐trial  motion  or  any  findings  of  fact  and  conclusions  of  law  relating  to   the  appellant’s  statement  that  was  ultimately  admitted  at  trial.     D.     The  undersigned  has  attempted  to  contact  the  court  reporter  in  the  instant   case  but  has  not  been  able  to  determine  whether  the  record  in  question  is  available.     Those  efforts  are  continuing.    The  undersigned  is  also  attempting  to  determine   whether  the  necessary  findings  and  conclusions  of  the  trial  court  are  available.     E.     It  would  appear  that  the  instant  matter  should  be  abated  and  returned  to  the   trial  court  for  purposes  of  the  entry  of  the  trial  Court’s  findings  of  fact  and   conclusions  of  law  pertinent  to  the  appellant’s  claims  regarding  the  admissibility  of   his  statement/confession.  See:  Vasquez  v.  State,  411  S.W.3d  918  (Tex.  Crim.  App.   2013);  State  v.  Elias,  339  S.W.3d  667  (Tex.  Crim.  App.  2011);  State  v.  Saenz,  411   S.W.3d  488  (Tex.  Crim.  App.  2013).     F.       There   are   existing   other   arguable   points   of   error   that   the   undersigned   will   continue  to  research  while  this  motion  awaits  resolution.     CONCLUSION  AND  PRAYER       Wherefore  premises  considered  the  appellant  would  request  that  this  court   abate   the   instant   appeal   for   purposes   of   the   supplementation   of   the   record   with   a   record  from  the  hearing  on  the  appellant’s  pre-­‐trial  motion  to  suppress  along  with   the  trial  court’s  findings  of  fact  and  conclusions  of  law  relating  to  that  motion.     Respectfully  submitted,     ________/s/__________________   Edward  F.  Shaughnessy,  III   Attorney  for  the  appellant     CERTIFICATE  OF  SERVICE       I,  Edward  F.  Shaughnessy,  attorney  for  the  appellant  hereby  certify  that  a   true  and  correct  copy  of  the  instant  motion  was  served,  by  U.S.  Mail  on  Mark  Ledet,   attorney  for  the  appellee  at  1327  3rd  Street,  Floresville  Texas,  78026,  on  this  the  27   day  of  February,  2014.     ________/s/___________________   Edward  F.  Shaughnessy   Attorney  for  the  appellant