1
DISMISS and Opinion Filed May 31, 2013
S In The
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-13-00064-CV
SHELLY SKEEN, Appellant
V.
CITY OF RICHARDSON, Appellee
On Appeal from the Municipal Court of the City of Richardson
Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. R0378453
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Chief Justice Wright and Justices Lang-Miers and Lewis
Opinion by Chief Justice Wright
By letter dated April 12, 2013, the Court questioned its jurisdiction over this appeal.
Specifically, we questioned whether the order appellant was appealing was reviewable by direct
appeal to this Court. We requested that appellant file a jurisdictional brief addressing the issue
and gave appellee an opportunity to respond. Both parties filed briefs addressing our concern.
Appellant is appealing an order from the Richardson Municipal Court finding her liable
for an automated traffic signal enforcement violation. The municipal court imposed a $75 fine
for the violation. Appellant filed a notice of appeal of the municipal court order directly to this
Court.
County criminal courts of appeal have sole jurisdiction of all appeals from criminal
convictions for violations of municipal ordinances of municipalities located in the county. See
1
TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 25.0594(a)(1) & 30.00014(a) (West Supp. 2012). The Texas
Constitution confers the courts of appeals with jurisdiction over “all cases of which the District
Courts or County Courts have original or appellate jurisdiction, under such restrictions and
regulations as may be prescribed by law.” Tex. Const. art. V, § 6(a). Section 30.00027(a) of the
government code provides:
(a) The appellant has the right to appeal to the court of appeals if:
(1) the fine assessed against the defendant exceeds $100 and the judgment
is affirmed by the appellate court; or
(2) the sole issue is the constitutionality of the statute or ordinance on
which a conviction is based.
TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 30.00027(a) (West Supp. 2012). This section limits our jurisdiction of
appeals from county criminal court appellate decisions to the specific situations set forth in the
statute. See Tex. Vital Care v. State, 323 S.W.3d 609, 612 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2010, no
pet.). If an appellate court is without jurisdiction over an appeal, it can only dismiss the appeal.
See Sherman v. State, 12 S.W.3d 489, 492 (Tex. App.—Dallas 1999, no pet.).
As stated in her notice of appeal, appellant appealed directly to this Court from the
municipal court. In her jurisdictional brief, appellant asserts that this Court does have
jurisdiction because section 30.00027(a) allows an appeal to the court of appeals if the sole issue
is the constitutionality of the ordinance. Appellant tells us the constitutionality of the ordinance
is her sole issue on appeal. Appealing the constitutionality, however, does not create an
exception to the statutory mandate that a county court of criminal appeals has sole jurisdiction
over appeals from municipal courts. Appellant skipped a required step – she failed to first take
her appeal to the county court of criminal appeals.
–2–
This Court has no jurisdiction over appeals directly from a municipal court. Accordingly,
we dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a).
/Carolyn Wright/
CAROLYN WRIGHT
130064F.P05 CHIEF JUSTICE
–3–
S
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
JUDGMENT
SHELLY SKEEN, Appellant On Appeal from the Municipal Court of the
City of Richardson, Dallas County, Texas.
No. 05-13-00064-CV V. Trial Court Cause No. R0378453.
Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright.
CITY OF RICHARDSON, Appellee Justices Lang-Miers and Lewis,
participating.
In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED.
It is ORDERED that appellee, CITY OF RICHARDSON, recover its costs of this appeal
from appellant, SHELLY SKEEN.
Judgment entered May 31, 2013
/Carolyn Wright/
CAROLYN WRIGHT
CHIEF JUSTICE
–4–