AFFIRM; and Opinion Filed May 3, 2013.
In The
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-12-01043-CR
ADOLFO RODRIGUEZ, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 204th Judicial District Court
Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. F12-52780-Q
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices FitzGerald, Murphy, and Lewis
Opinion by Justice Lewis
Adolfo Rodriguez waived a jury and pleaded guilty to indecency with a child. See TEX.
PENAL CODE ANN. § 21.11(a) (West 2011). The trial court deferred adjudicating guilt, placed
appellant on ten years’ community supervision, and assessed a $2,000 fine. The trial court later
granted the State’s motion to adjudicate, finding appellant violated the terms of his community
supervision, and assessed punishment at twenty years’ imprisonment. On appeal, appellant’s
attorney filed a brief in which she concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit.
The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief
presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable
grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.]
1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant of his right to
file a pro se response, but he did not file a pro se response.
We have reviewed the record and counsel’s brief. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824,
827 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (explaining appellate court’s duty in Anders cases). We agree the
appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support
the appeal.
We affirm the trial court’s judgment.
/David Lewis/
DAVID LEWIS
JUSTICE
Do Not Publish
TEX. R. APP. P. 47
121043F.U05
-2-
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
JUDGMENT
ADOLFO RODRIGUEZ, Appellant Appeal from the 204th Judicial District
Court of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No.
No. 05-12-01043-CR V. F12-52780-Q).
Opinion delivered by Justice Lewis,
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Justices FitzGerald and Murphy
participating.
Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
Judgment entered May 3, 2013.
/David Lewis/
DAVID LEWIS
JUSTICE
-3-