COURT OF APPEALS
SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH
NO. 02-12-00295-CV
IN RE WILLIAM SULLIVAN RELATOR
------------
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
------------
MEMORANDUM OPINION1
------------
The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and is of
the opinion that relief should be denied.2 Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of
mandamus is denied.
PER CURIAM
PANEL: MCCOY, DAUPHINOT, and GARDNER, JJ.
1
See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4, 52.8(d).
2
The relator complains that the respondent has failed to hold a hearing on
his pro se application for writ of habeas corpus bond reduction, but the trial court
clerk has indicated that relator is still represented by appointed counsel and that
there is no motion to withdraw on file. See Ex parte Bohannan, 350 S.W.3d 116,
116 n.1 (Tex. Crim. App. 2011) (noting that when an applicant is represented by
counsel, he is not entitled to hybrid representation, and the court can disregard
his pro se submissions and take no action on them).
DELIVERED: July 25, 2012
2