DISMISS; and Opinion Filed April 3, 2013.
S In The
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-13-00293-CR
No. 05-13-00294-CR
No. 05-13-00295-CR
EX PARTE LESTER JON RUSTON
On Appeal from the 194th Judicial District Court
Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause Nos. F04-15925-M, F04-21379-M, F04-24674-M
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Lang-Miers, Murphy, and Fillmore
Opinion by Justice Lang-Miers
Lester Jon Ruston was charged with three felony offenses. The cases did not proceed to
trial and were dismissed, on the State’s motion, on September 30, 2008. In 2012, appellant filed
a petition for writ of prohibition and an amended petition for writ of prohibition asking that the
trial court issue “an immediate peremptory writ” against the State of Texas “restraining the State
of Texas from any further acts of fraud, crime, obstruction of justice, or contempt of any court
orders.” The trial court concluded the petition was without merit and denied it. Appellant
appealed the trial court’s order.
On March 7, 2013, we sent appellant and the State a letter questioning our jurisdiction
over the appeal. Because it initially appeared appellant’s petition for writ of prohibition sought
dismissal of the criminal prosecutions, we questioned whether a petition for writ of prohibition is
the appropriate vehicle for seeking dismissal of a prosecution and whether we had jurisdiction
over the appeal from the order denying the petition. Appellant did not file a jurisdictional brief.
Rather, he filed in this Court a new petition for writ of prohibition, which has been docketed as a
separate original proceeding.
Rather than seeking actual dismissal of the charges, it appears appellant sought a
preemptive determination that the State may not prosecute him on the charges. Nothing in the
record before the Court shows the State refiled the charges or is pursuing a prosecution of
appellant. Moreover, in a criminal case, only the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals has authority
to issue a writ of prohibition of the type appellant appears to be seeking. See TEX. CONST. art. V,
§ 5; TEX. CODE CRIM. P. Ann. arts. 4.03, 4.04 (West 2005 & Supp. 2012). See also Allen v.
Guarino, 635 S.W.2d 129, 129 (Tex. App.–Houston [1st Dist.] 1981, no pet.) (per curiam)
(courts of appeals do not have jurisdiction to issue writ of prohibition to prevent reindictment).
Because there is nothing before the Court over which we have jurisdiction, we dismiss
the appeals.
/Elizabeth Lang-Miers/
ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS
JUSTICE
Do Not Publish
TEX. R. APP. P. 47
130293F.U05
–2–
S
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
JUDGMENT
EX PARTE LESTER JON RUSTON On Appeal from the 194th Judicial District
Court, Dallas County, Texas
No. 05-13-00293-CR Trial Court Cause No. F04-15925-M.
Opinion delivered by Justice Lang-Miers,
Justices Murphy and Fillmore participating.
Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal for want of
jurisdiction.
Judgment entered this 3rd day of April, 2013.
/Elizabeth Lang-Miers/
ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS
JUSTICE
–3–
S
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
JUDGMENT
EX PARTE LESTER JON RUSTON On Appeal from the 194th Judicial District
Court, Dallas County, Texas
No. 05-13-00294-CR Trial Court Cause No. F04-21379-M.
Opinion delivered by Justice Lang-Miers,
Justices Murphy and Fillmore participating.
Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal for want of
jurisdiction.
Judgment entered this 3rd day of April, 2013.
/Elizabeth Lang-Miers/
ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS
JUSTICE
–4–
S
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
JUDGMENT
EX PARTE LESTER JON RUSTON On Appeal from the 194th Judicial District
Court, Dallas County, Texas
No. 05-13-00295-CR Trial Court Cause No. F04-24674-M.
Opinion delivered by Justice Lang-Miers,
Justices Murphy and Fillmore participating.
Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal for want of
jurisdiction.
Judgment entered this 3rd day of April, 2013.
/Elizabeth Lang-Miers/
ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS
JUSTICE
–5–