Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-13-00563-CR
Rene GONZALES,
Appellant
v.
The STATE of Texas,
Appellee
From the 227th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
Trial Court No. 2012CR8313
Honorable Philip A. Kazen Jr., Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice
Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
Delivered and Filed: October 9, 2013
DISMISSED
The trial court’s certification in this appeal states that “this criminal case is a plea-bargain
case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” The clerk’s record contains a written plea bargain,
and the punishment assessed did not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and
agreed to by the defendant; therefore, the trial court’s certification accurately reflects that the
underlying case is a plea-bargain case. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2).
04-13-00563-CR
Rule 25.2(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure states “The appeal must be
dismissed if a certification that shows the defendant has a right of appeal has not been made part
of the record under these rules.” TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d).
On August 30, 2013, we ordered that this appeal would be dismissed pursuant to rule
25.2(d) unless an amended trial court certification showing that the appellant has the right of appeal
was made part of the appellate record by September 30, 2013. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d), 37.1;
see also Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); Daniels v. State, 110 S.W.3d
174 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2003, no pet.).
On September 24, 2013, Appellant’s retained counsel filed a response stating that before
Appellant accepted the plea offer, counsel had thoroughly explained to Appellant that by entering
into the plea agreement Appellant would waive his right to appeal.
Given the record and Appellant’s response, Rule 25.2(d) requires this court to dismiss this
appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.
PER CURIAM
DO NOT PUBLISH
-2-