Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-13-00271-CR
Lilnifty General WILSON,
Appellant
v.
The STATE of
The STATE of Texas,
Appellee
From the 227th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
Trial Court No. 2012CR8462
Honorable Philip A. Kazen, Jr., Judge Presiding
Opinion by: Karen Angelini, Justice
Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice
Marialyn Barnard, Justice
Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice
Delivered and Filed: October 2, 2013
AFFIRMED
Appellant was indicted for the offense of retaliation. After entering a plea of nolo
contendere, appellant was placed on deferred-adjudication community supervision for a period of
five years pursuant to a plea-bargain agreement. On March 18, 2013, the State moved to revoke
his community supervision and enter an adjudication of guilt. On March 28, 2013, appellant pled
true to having violated the terms and conditions of his community supervision, and the trial court
revoked his community supervision, adjudicated his guilt, and sentenced him to four years of
imprisonment and a $1500 fine. Appellant then filed a notice of appeal. His court-appointed
04-13-00271-CR
appellate attorney filed a brief in which he concludes that this appeal is frivolous and without merit.
See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App.
1978). Counsel states that appellant was provided with a copy of the brief and motion to withdraw
and was further informed of his right to review the record and file his own brief. See Bruns v. State,
924 S.W.2d 176, 177 n.1 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1996, no pet.). Appellant did not file a pro se
brief.
We have reviewed the record and counsel’s brief. We agree that the appeal is frivolous and
without merit. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Furthermore, we grant the motion to
withdraw. See Nichols v. State, 954 S.W.2d 83, 85-86 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1997, no pet.);
Bruns, 924 S.W.2d at 177 n.1.
No substitute counsel will be appointed. Should appellant wish to seek further review of
this case by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, he must either retain an attorney to file a petition
for discretionary review or file a pro se petition for discretionary review. Any petition for
discretionary review must be filed within thirty days from the later of (1) the date of this opinion;
or (2) the date the last timely motion for rehearing is overruled by this court. See Tex. R. App. P.
68.2. Any petition for discretionary review must be filed in the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals.
See Tex. R. App. P. 68.3. Any petition for discretionary review should comply with the
requirements of Rule 68.4 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See Tex. R. App. P. 68.4.
Karen Angelini, Justice
Do not publish
-2-