Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-12-00695-CR
Monica Ann AVILA,
Appellant
v.
The STATE of TexasAppellee
The STATE of Texas,
Appellee
From the 226th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
Trial Court No. 2007CR11313A
Honorable Sid L. Harle, Judge Presiding
Opinion by: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice
Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice
Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice
Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
Delivered and Filed: September 11, 2013
AFFIRMED
Monica Ann Avila pled true to violating the conditions of her community supervision. The
trial court revoked her community supervision and sentenced her to six years’ imprisonment.
Avila’s court-appointed attorney filed a brief containing a professional evaluation of the record in
accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel concludes that the appeal
has no merit. Avila was provided with a copy of the brief and informed of her right to review the
record and file her own brief. See Nichols v. State, 954 S.W.2d 83, 85-86 (Tex. App.—San
04-12-00695-CR
Antonio 1997, no pet.); Bruns v. State, 924 S.W.2d 176, 177 n.1 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1996,
no pet.). Avila did not file a pro se brief.
After reviewing the record and counsel’s brief, we conclude that the appeal is frivolous and
without merit. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Appellate counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted. Nichols, 954 S.W.2d at 86; Bruns, 924
S.W.2d at 177 n.1. No substitute counsel will be appointed. Should Avila wish to seek further
review of this case by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, Avila must either retain an attorney
to file a petition for discretionary review or Avila must file a pro se petition for discretionary
review. Any petition for discretionary review must be filed within thirty days from the later of:
(1) the date of this opinion; or (2) the date the last timely motion for rehearing is overruled by this
court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 68.2. Any petition for discretionary review must be filed in the Texas
Court of Criminal Appeals. See TEX. R. APP. P. 68.3. Any petition for discretionary review should
comply with the requirements of Rule 68.4 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX.
R. APP. P. 68.4.
Catherine Stone, Chief Justice
DO NOT PUBLISH
-2-