Young, James Keith v. State

AFFIRM; Opinion Filed February 27, 2013. In The Chart of appeals 1f fifth Emma of (Items at Eallas No. 05-12-00533—C R JAMES KEITH YOUNG, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee m Mr. On Apffe; Dallas County, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Francis, Lang, and Evans Opinion by Justice Evans James Keith Young waived a jury and pleaded guilty to burglary of a habitation. See TEX, PENAL CODE ANN. § 3002(3) (West 2011). The trial court assessed punishment at eight years’ imprisonment. On appeal, appellant’s attorney filed a brief in which she concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 US. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant of his right to file a pro se response, but he did not file a pro se response. We have reviewed the record and counsel’s brief. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 827 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (explaining appellate court’s duty in Anders cases). We agree the appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. We affirm the trial court’s judgment. p , . JUSTICE Do Not Publish TEX. R. APP. P. 47 120533F.U05 (Enurt of gppeals inftb %i§tri£t of Emma at 18311515 JUDGMENT JAMES KElTH YOUNG, Appellant Appeal from the 282nd Judicial District Court of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. No. OS-lZ-OOSB3-CR V. Fl 1-63495-8). Opinion delivered by Justice Evans, THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Justices Francis and Lang participating. Based on the Court’s opinion ofthis date, the trial court’s judgment is AFFIRMED. Judgment entered February 27, 2013. JUSTICE