in the Interest of K.A.H and K.J.M.H., Children

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-13-00154-CV IN THE INTEREST OF K.A.H. and K.J.M.H., Children From the County Court at Law, Kendall County, Texas Trial Court No. 08-0117CCL The Honorable Cathy O. Morris, Judge Presiding Opinion by: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice Delivered and Filed: July 24, 2013 AFFIRMED This is an appeal from the trial court’s termination of appellant’s parental rights. See TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 161.001(1)(E), (N), (O), (2) (West Supp. 2013). Appellant’s court-appointed attorney filed a brief containing a professional evaluation of the record and demonstrating that there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. Counsel concludes that the appeal is without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). See In re R.R., No. 04-03-00096-CV, 2003 WL 21157944, at * 4 (Tex. App.—San Antonio May 21, 2003, no pet.) (applying Anders procedure in appeal from termination of parental rights), disp. on merits, 2003 WL 22080522 (Tex. App.—San Antonio Sept. 10, 2003, no pet.) (mem. op.). Counsel provided appellant with a copy of the brief. Appellant was informed of her right to review the record and advised of her right to file a pro se brief. Appellant has not filed a brief. 04-13-00154-CV After reviewing the record and counsel’s brief, we agree the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. We GRANT counsel’s motion to withdraw. Nichols v. State, 954 S.W.2d 83, 86 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1997, no pet.); Bruns v. State, 924 S.W.2d 176, 177 n.1 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1996, no pet.). Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice -2-