Afllrined: Opinion Filed November 2S, 2012.
In The
court of ppcat
jfittlj itritt of exa at afta
No. 05-i 1-01061-CR
No. 05-11-01062-CR
ARMANDO FERMIN SOTO, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the Criminal District Court
I)aHas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause Nos. FI0-19502-H, FI0-19503-H
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before .Justices Richter. Lang-Miers, and Iyers
Opinion by Justice Lang-Miers
A jury convicted Armando Fermin Soto of Iwo intoxication manslaughter offenses and assessed
punishment at twenty years’ imprisonment and a $10,000 fine in each case. See TFix. PENAL CODE ANN.
§ 49.08(a) (West 2011). The trial court granted the State’s motion to cumulate the sentences and ordered
the sentences to run consecutively. On appeal, appellant’s attorney filed a brief in which she concludes
the appeals are wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v.
califrnia, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why,
in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807. 81 l (Tex. Crim.
___
App. LPanel Op1 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant of his
right to tile a pro se response. hut he did not file a pro se response.
We have reviewed the record and counsel’s brieF. See ffledsoe v. StalL’, 178 S.W3d 824, 827
(Tex. Crim, App. 2005) (explaining appellate court’s duty in Anders cases). We agree the appeals are
Irivolons and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeals.
We affirm the trial court’s judgments.
/ LL—
EL1ZABTH LANGMlERS /
JUSTICE
Do Not Publish
Tx. R. App. P.47
111061 RUO5
Qtottrt of 1pptat
if Ift 1E1itrict of exa at atta
JUDGMENT
ARMANDO FERMIN SOTO, Appellant Appeal from the Criminal District Court of
Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. Fl 0-
No. 05-1 1-01061-CR V I 9502-H).
Opinion delivered by Justice Lang-Miers,
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Justices Richter and Myers participating.
Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
Judgment entered November 28, 2012
ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS
JUSTICE
Qtourt of tpptat
if ittlj itrttt of Exa at atta
JUDGMENT
ARMAND() IERM IN SOTO, Appellant Appeal from the Criminal District Court of
Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. Fl 0-
No. 05-1 1-01062-CR V 1 9503-H).
Opinion delivered by Justice Lang-Miers,
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Justices Richter and Myers participating.
Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
Judgment entered i\ovember 28, 2012
7/
ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS
JUSTICE