Order entered October e , 2012
In The
Court of appeafti
fifth Oiotritt of Texao at 3Ballass
No. 05-12-00591-CR
No. 05-12-00592-CR
BRUCE KEVIN CONWAY, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 194th District Court
Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause Nos. F07-57835-M, F10-61538-M
ORDER
Appellant's brief is overdue. We also note that the Court has not received copies of the
trial court's certifications of appellant's right to appeal.
Accordingly, we ORDER the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why
appellant's brief has not been filed. In this regard, the trial court shall make appropriate findings
and recommendations and determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeals, whether
appellant is indigent, or if not indigent, whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeal. See
TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b). If the trial court cannot obtain appellant's presence at the hearing, the
trial court shall conduct the hearing in appellant's absence. See Meza v. State, 742 S.W.2d 708
(Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (per curiam). If appellant is indigent, the trial court is
ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective representation, which
may include appointment of new counsel.
We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which shall include
written findings and recommendations, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this
order.
The appeals are ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above order. The
appeals shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are
received, whichever is earlier.
DAVID L. BRIDGES
JUSTICE