Robert M. Zapata v. Bank of America, N.A.

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-15-00375-CV Robert M. Zapata, Appellant v. Bank of America, N.A., Appellee FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF HAYS COUNTY NO. 15-0173-C, HONORABLE ROBERT UPDEGROVE, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION Robert M. Zapata appeals from a judgment awarding possession in a forcible detainer case. His opening brief was originally due on September 14, 2015. After Zapata failed to timely file his brief, the Clerk of this Court sent notice to him—on September 21, 2015—advising that his brief was overdue and that if he did not file a brief or otherwise respond with a reasonable explanation by October 1, 2015, his appeal would be subject to dismissal for want of prosecution.1 The October 1 deadline has passed, and to date Zapata has not filed a brief or otherwise responded. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution.2 1 See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1) (if appellant fails to timely file a brief, this Court is empowered to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellant reasonably explains the failure and appellee is not significantly injured by that failure). 2 See id. R. 42.3(b). __________________________________________ Bob Pemberton, Justice Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Pemberton and Field Dismissed for Want of Prosecution Filed: October 15, 2015 2