Thomas William Jones v. State

02-11-034-CR


COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

 

 

NO. 02-11-00034-CR

 

 

Thomas William Jones

 

APPELLANT

 

V.

 

The State of Texas

 

STATE

 

 

----------

FROM THE 396th District Court OF Tarrant COUNTY

----------

MEMORANDUM OPINION[1]

----------

          Appellant Thomas William Jones entered an open plea of guilty to possession of less than one gram of cocaine, and the trial court sentenced him to three years’ confinement.  See Tex. Health & Safety Code Ann. § 481.115(a), (b) (West 2010); Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 12.42(a)(1) (West 2011).  Jones’s court-appointed appellate counsel has filed a motion to withdraw as counsel and a brief in support of that motion.  Counsel avers that in his professional opinion, the appeal is frivolous.  Counsel’s brief and motion meet the requirements of Anders v. California by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds for relief.  See 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967).  This court informed Jones that he may file a pro se brief, and he has done so.  The State declined to submit a brief in response to the Anders brief or to Jones’s brief.

          Once an appellant’s court-appointed attorney files a motion to withdraw on the ground that the appeal is frivolous and fulfills the requirements of Anders, this court is obligated to undertake an independent examination of the record.  See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991); Mays v. State, 904 S.W.2d 920, 922–23 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1995, no pet.).  Only then may we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.  See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 82–83, 109 S. Ct. 346, 351 (1988).

          We have carefully reviewed the record, Jones’s brief, and counsel’s brief.  We agree with counsel that this appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit; we find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal.  See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 827–28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); see also Meza v. State, 206 S.W.3d 684, 685 n.6 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006).  Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw and affirm the trial court’s judgment.

 

 

BILL MEIER
JUSTICE

 

PANEL:  LIVINGSTON, C.J.; DAUPHINOT and MEIER, JJ.

 

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

 

DELIVERED:  October 27, 2011



[1]See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.