Derrick Jackson v. State

Opinion issued February 9, 2012.

 

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

————————————

NO. 01-10-00987-CR

———————————

DERRICK JACKSON, Appellant

V.

The State of Texas, Appellee

 

 

On Appeal from the 177th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 1253949

 

 


 

MEMORANDUM OPINION

 

          Appellant Derrick Jackson was indicted for robbing a man at knife-point and stealing $1,700 in cash.  Jackson pleaded not guilty to the offense of aggravated robbery.  See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 29.03 (West 2011).  A jury found Jackson guilty, and the court sentenced him to 33 years in prison.

          Appellant’s appointed counsel on appeal has filed a motion to withdraw, along with an Anders brief stating that the record presents no reversible error and therefore the appeal is without merit and is frivolous.  See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967). 

          Counsel’s brief meets the Anders requirements by presenting a professional evaluation of the record.  See Anders, 386 U.S. at 744, 87 S. Ct. at 1400; see also High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 812 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978).  Counsel discusses the evidence adduced at the trial, supplies us with references to the record, and provides us with citation to legal authorities. Counsel indicates that she has thoroughly reviewed the record and that she is unable to advance any grounds of error that warrant reversal.  See Anders, 386 U.S. at 744, 87 S. Ct. at 1400; Mitchell v. State, 193 S.W.3d 153, 154 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2006, no pet.).

          In addition, counsel’s brief reflects that she delivered a copy of the brief to appellant and informed him of his right to examine the appellate record and to file a response.  See In re Schulman, 252 S.W.3d 403, 408 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008).  Appellant has not filed a pro se response.

          We have independently reviewed the entire record, and we conclude that no reversible error exists in the record, that there are no arguable grounds for review, and that therefore the appeal is frivolous.  See Anders, 386 U.S. at 744, 87 S. Ct. at 1400; Garner v. State, 300 S.W.3d 763, 767 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009) (explaining that frivolity is determined by considering whether there are “arguable grounds” for review); Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826–27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (emphasizing that reviewing court—and not counsel—determines, after full examination of proceedings, whether the appeal is wholly frivolous); Mitchell, 193 S.W.3d at 155.  An appellant may challenge a holding that there are no arguable grounds for appeal by filing a petition for discretionary review in the Court of Criminal Appeals. See Bledsoe, 178 S.W.3d 827 & n.6.

          We affirm the judgment of the trial court and grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.[1]  Attorney, Deborah Summers, must immediately send the notice required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 6.5(c) and file a copy of that notice with the Clerk of this Court.  See Tex. R. App. P. 6.5(c).  We dismiss all pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

                                                                  

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Massengale, and Huddle.

Do not publish.  Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

 



[1]        Appointed counsel still has a duty to inform appellant of the result of this appeal and that he may, on his own, pursue discretionary review in the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826–27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).