MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-11-00486-CR
Jesus BONILLA,
Appellant
v.
The STATE of Texas,
Appellee
From the 379th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
Trial Court No. 2010CR4777W
Honorable Ron Rangel, Judge Presiding
Opinion by: Karen Angelini, Justice
Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice
Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice
Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice
Delivered and Filed: March 14, 2012
AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED; MOTION TO WITHDRAW GRANTED
Based on Jesus Bonilla’s plea of true to violating a condition of his community
supervision, the trial court revoked Bonilla’s community supervision and sentenced him to three
years imprisonment. Bonilla filed a notice of appeal. Bonilla’s court-appointed appellate counsel
has filed a motion to withdraw and a brief in which he concludes that this appeal is frivolous and
without merit. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807
(Tex. Crim. App. 1978). Counsel states appellant was provided with a copy of the brief and the
04-11-00486-CR
motion to withdraw, and was further informed of his right to review the record and file his own
brief. See Bruns v. State, 924 S.W.2d 176, 177 n. 1 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1996, no pet.).
Counsel also states the judgment contains a clerical error, which he asks this court to correct.
We have reviewed the record and counsel’s brief. 1 We agree with counsel that this appeal
is frivolous and without merit. We also agree with counsel that the judgment contains an error.
The judgment states Bonilla was represented by Joel G. Richardson; however, the record shows
Bonilla was represented by Rochelle M. Acevedo. We therefore modify the judgment to show
Bonilla was represented by Rochelle M. Acevedo. See TEX. R. APP. P. 43.2(b); Bigley v. State,
865 S.W.2d 26, 27–28 (Tex. Crim. App. 1993); Asberry v. State, 813 S.W.2d 526, 529–30 (Tex.
App.—Dallas 1991, pet. ref’d).
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed as modified. Furthermore, we grant the motion
to withdraw. See Nichols v. State, 954 S.W.2d 83, 85–86 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1997, no
pet.); Bruns, 924 S.W.2d at 177 n. l.
No substitute counsel will be appointed. Should appellant wish to seek further review of
this case by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, he must either retain an attorney to file a
petition for discretionary review or file a pro se petition for discretionary review. Any petition
for discretionary review must be filed within thirty days from the later of (1) the date of this
opinion; or (2) the date the last timely motion for rehearing is overruled by this court. See TEX.
R. APP. P. 68.2. Any petition for discretionary review must be filed in the Texas Court of
Criminal Appeals. See TEX. R. APP. P. 68.3. Any petition for discretionary review should comply
1
Bonilla has not filed a pro se brief.
-2-
04-11-00486-CR
with the requirements of Rule 68.4 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP.
P. 68.4.
Karen Angelini, Justice
DO NOT PUBLISH
-3-