|
COURT OF APPEALS
SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH
NO. 2-09-137-CR
SHEILA LYNN BURNS APPELLANT
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE
------------
FROM THE 396TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY
------------
MEMORANDUM OPINION[1]
------------
In two issues, appellant Sheila Lynn Burns contends that her twenty-year sentence for possession of four or more but less than two hundred grams of methamphetamine with intent to deliver is disproportionate and cruel and unusual, and that it was outside the authority of the presentence investigation officer to recommend a term of years in prison. Neither of these complaints was preserved at trial. See Tex. R. App. P. 33.1(a)(1); Rhoades v. State, 934 S.W.2d 113, 120 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996); Sanchez v. State, 222 S.W.3d 85, 89B90 (Tex. App.CTyler 2006, no pet.); Wooley v. State, Nos. 02-06-00442-CR, 02-06-00443-CR, 02-06-00444-CR, 2007 WL 3037932, at *1 (Tex. App.CFort Worth Oct. 18, 2007, pet. dism=d, untimely filed) (mem. op., not designated for publication); see also Stewart v. LaGrand, 526 U.S. 115, 119B20, 119 S. Ct. 1018, 1021 (1999) (holding that Eighth Amendment complaint can be procedurally defaulted).[2]
Accordingly, we overrule both points and affirm the trial court=s judgment.
PER CURIAM
PANEL: LIVINGSTON, DAUPHINOT, and MEIER, JJ.
DAUPHINOT, J. concurs without opinion.
DO NOT PUBLISH
Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)
DELIVERED: January 14, 2010
[1]See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
[2]Moreover, even if appellant had preserved these complaints, the sentence was within the range of punishment for the offense, and this court has held that it is not improper for the author of a presentence investigation report to make a sentencing recommendation. See Burchfield v. State, 02-08-00435-CR, 2009 WL 2462511, at * 2 (Tex. App.CFort Worth Aug. 13, 2009, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication); Moore v. State, 54 S.W.3d 529, 542 (Tex. App.CFort Worth 2001, pet. ref=d); see Tex. Health & Safety Code Ann. ' 481.115(d) (Vernon Supp. 2009); Tex. Penal Code Ann. ' 12.33(a) (Vernon Supp. 2009).