In the Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided: October 19, 2015
S16Y0025.IN THE MATTER OF MORRIS P. FAIR, JR.
PER CURIAM.
This disciplinary matter is before the Court on the petition for voluntary
discipline filed by Respondent Morris P. Fair, Jr. (State Bar No. 581019),
pursuant to Bar Rule 4-227 (b) (2), in which he seeks to resolve a pending
disciplinary matter involving his representation of a client in a habeas case. In
his petition, Fair admits that his conduct in that case violated Rules 1.3 and 1.4
of the Georgia Rules of Professional Conduct, see Bar Rule 4-102 (d). The
maximum sanction for a violation of Rule 1.3 is disbarment, and the maximum
sanction for a violation of Rule 1.4 is a public reprimand.
Fair, who has been a member of the Bar since 2000, acknowledges that he
failed to act with reasonable diligence and promptness in his representation of
the habeas petitioner, who had filed his petition pro se before Fair entered an
appearance on his behalf and secured a date for a hearing on the petition. Upon
entering into the representation, Fair explained to the client that his case
schedule would delay the habeas case, which would also give the client time to
pay Fair’s fee. Fair acknowledges that he did not always promptly return the
client's phone calls, but states that he did speak to the client at least once per
week and visited the client on three occasions while the petition was pending.
At the hearing on the petition, Fair requested 30 days in which to file a brief,
which he failed to file timely because of his criminal case schedule; Fair did
explain to the client his failure to timely file the brief. Fair seeks a Review
Panel reprimand. In response, the State Bar notes in aggravation that Fair has
prior disciplinary offenses, including his receipt of formal letters of admonition
in 2010 and 2015; his indefinite suspension in 2010, see In the Matter of Fair,
288 Ga. 17 (701 SE2d 160) (2010), which was lifted in 2013, nunc pro tunc to
October 3, 2011, see In the Matter of Fair, 292 Ga. 308 (736 SE2d 430) (2013);
and his two interim suspensions in 2008 and 2015, respectively. In mitigation,
the State Bar notes that Fair did not have a dishonest or selfish motive and
displayed a cooperative attitude towards the disciplinary proceeding. The State
Bar recommends that this Court accept Fair’s petition for voluntary discipline
and order that Fair receive a Review Panel reprimand.
Having reviewed the record as a whole, we do not agree that imposition
2
of a Review Panel reprimand is the appropriate sanction in this matter,
particularly in light of Fair’s prior disciplinary history. See In the Matter of
Boykin, 290 Ga. 871 (725 SE2d 324) (2012) (noting petitioner’s prior
disciplinary history in rejection of petition for voluntary discipline); In the
Matter of E. T. M., 285 Ga. 814, 683 S.E.2d 596 (2009) (rejecting petition for
voluntary discipline despite Bar’s lack of objection). Accordingly, this Court
rejects Fair’s petition for voluntary discipline.
Petition for voluntary discipline rejected. All the Justices concur.
3