In the United States Court of Federal Claims
OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
No. 15-0386V
Filed: September 14, 2015
Unpublished
****************************
KATYA SIDO, *
*
*
Petitioner, * Damages Decision Based on Proffer;
* Influenza (“flu”) vaccine; Shoulder Injury
v. * Related to Vaccine Administration
* (“SIRVA”); Special Processing Unit
* (“SPU”)
SECRETARY OF HEALTH *
AND HUMAN SERVICES, *
*
Respondent. *
****************************
Amber D. Wilson, Maglio Christopher and Toale, PA, Washington, DC, for petitioner.
Justine E. Walter, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.
DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES 1
Vowell, Special Master:
On April 16, 2015, Katya Sido filed a petition for compensation under the
National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq, 2 [the
“Vaccine Act” or “Program”]. The petition alleged that as a result of an influenza (“flu”)
vaccination on November 1, 2013, petitioner suffered a shoulder injury related to
vaccine administration (“SIRVA”). Petition at ¶¶2, 14-15. The case was assigned to the
Special Processing Unit (“SPU”) of the Office of Special Masters.
On June 30, 2015, I issued a ruling on entitlement, finding petitioner entitled to
compensation. On September 14, 2015, respondent filed a proffer on award of
compensation (“Proffer”) detailing compensation for all elements of compensation to
1
Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I intend
to post this decision on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with the E-
Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (Dec. 17, 2002). In accordance with
Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioners have 14 days to identify and move to delete medical or other information,
the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that
the identified material fits within this definition, I will delete such material from public access.
2
National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for
ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §
300aa (2012).
which petitioner would be entitled under §15(a). According to respondent’s Proffer,
petitioner agrees to the proposed award of compensation.
Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, I award petitioner a lump
sum payment of $122,390.25 in the form of a check payable to petitioner.
This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available
under §15(a).
The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this
decision. 3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Denise K. Vowell
Denise K. Vowell
Special Master
3
Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by each party filing a notice
renouncing the right to seek review.
2
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS
OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
)
KATYA SIDO, )
)
Petitioner, )
) No. 15-386V
v. ) Special Master Vowell
) ECF
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND ) SPU
HUMAN SERVICES, )
)
Respondent. )
)
RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION
On April 16, 2015, petitioner, Katya Sido, filed a petition for compensation under the
National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-10 to -34 (“Vaccine Act”), alleging
that she suffered from a right shoulder injury as a result of receiving an influenza vaccination in
her right arm on November 1, 2013. On June 29, 2015, respondent filed her Rule 4(c) Report
stating that petitioner’s right arm injury is consistent with a shoulder injury related to vaccine
administration (“SIRVA”). Respondent conceded that petitioner’s SIRVA is compensable under
the Vaccine Act. Accordingly, on June 30, 2015, Special Master Vowell issued a Ruling on
Entitlement finding that petitioner is entitled to compensation for SIRVA. For the purposes of
this proffer, the term “vaccine-related” is as described in Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report filed on
June 29, 2015.
I. Items of Compensation
Based upon the evidence of record, respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded
$122,390.25, which represents all elements of compensation to which petitioner is entitled under
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). 1 Petitioner agrees.
II. Form of the Award
The parties recommend that the compensation provided to petitioner should be made
through a lump sum payment of $122,390.25 in the form of a check payable to petitioner.
Petitioner agrees.
Respectfully submitted,
BENJAMIN C. MIZER
Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General
RUPA BHATTACHARYYA
Director
Torts Branch, Civil Division
VINCENT J. MATANOSKI
Deputy Director
Torts Branch, Civil Division
GLENN A. MACLEOD
Senior Trial Counsel
Torts Branch, Civil Division
s/ Justine Walters
JUSTINE WALTERS
Trial Attorney
Torts Branch, Civil Division
U.S. Department of Justice
P.O. Box 146, Benjamin Franklin Station
Washington, D.C. 20044-0146
Tel.: (202) 307-6393
DATE: September 14, 2015
1
Should petitioner die prior to entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the Court
for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future medical
expenses, future lost earnings, and future pain and suffering.
2