Cite as 2015 Ark. App. 580
ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS
DIVISION I
No. CV-15-1
Opinion Delivered October 21, 2015
TIERRA STEWART and RANDALL APPEAL FROM THE DREW
STEWART COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT
APPELLANTS [NO. CV-2012-0058-4]
V. HONORABLE DON GLOVER,
JUDGE
ESTATE OF BOBBY NOLAN
HERRING SUPPLEMENTAL ADDENDUM
APPELLEE ORDERED
BRANDON J. HARRISON, Judge
Tierra and Randall Stewart appeal a June 2014 circuit court order awarding Bobby
Herring’s guardianship estate a $42,355 judgment against Tierra individually and a $9,900
judgment against Tierra and Randall. We do not reach the merits of the Stewarts’ appeal
because of addendum deficiencies.
Arkansas Supreme Court Rule 4-2(a)(8) requires an addendum to contain all
documents in the record that “are essential for the appellate court to confirm its
jurisdiction, to understand the case, and to decide the issues on appeal.” Specifically, the
rule requires the appellant to include in the addendum “any motion to extend the time to
file the record on appeal, and any related response, reply, or exhibit” and “any order
extending the time to file the record on appeal.” Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 4-2(a)(8)(A)(i) (2015).
1
Cite as 2015 Ark. App. 580
The Stewarts have failed to include the motion and order to extend the time to file the
record on appeal in their addendum. Also missing from the addendum are all pleadings
and orders filed in the case, including ones about default judgment. The appealed June
2014 order expressly considers Plaintiff’s Exhibits 8, 9, 10, and 11, and Defendant’s
Exhibit 13. We therefore need copies in the addendum of all the exhibits the circuit
court referenced in its June 2014 order and any of the 35 trial exhibits that are necessary
for us to understand and decide the appeal. Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 4-2(a)(8)(A)(i).
We direct the Stewarts to correct these deficiencies by filing a supplemental
addendum within seven calendar days from the date of this opinion. Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 4-
2(b)(4). The list of deficiencies mentioned here is not necessarily an exhaustive one. We
encourage the Stewarts to review our rules before filing a supplemental addendum and
correct any deficiencies or inaccuracies in addition to those that we have mentioned
specifically.
Supplemental addendum ordered.
ABRAMSON and BROWN, JJ., agree.
Joseph P. Mazzanti III, for appellants.
Hashem Law Firm, PLC, by: Hani W. Hashem, for appellee.
2