Cite as 2015 Ark. App. 567
ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS
DIVISION I
No. CV-14-1096
Opinion Delivered October 16, 2015
JEANNIE SHERMAN APPEAL FROM THE CROSS
APPELLANT COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT
[NO. 19-DR-12-81-4]
V.
HONORABLE KATHLEEN BELL,
RAYMOND BOECKMANN JUDGE
APPELLEE
SUBSTITUTED OPINION
SUPPLEMENTATION ORDERED
BRANDON J. HARRISON, Judge
Jeannie Sherman and Raymond Boeckmann were divorced by order of the Cross
County Circuit Court in September 2013. Sherman appeals from the circuit court’s order
finding her in contempt for misuse of marital funds. Due to briefing deficiencies, we order
supplementation of the abstract and addendum.1
This appeal concerns multiple hearings and petitions for contempt filed by
Boeckmann. We note that one hearing in particular, conducted on 25 November 2013,
has not been abstracted, and two of Boeckmann’s contempt petitions, filed 29 October 2013
and 20 November 2013, are not included in the addendum. We also note that the transcript
1
This case was originally handed down in a combined opinion with CV-14-353. We are
now issuing two separate opinions for CV-14-353 and CV-14-1096.
1
Cite as 2015 Ark. App. 567
for the November 25 hearing and these two petitions are not included in the record;
however, both the November 25 hearing transcript and the petitions have been tendered to
this court by motion.2 Under these unique circumstances, we hereby deem the record in
CV-14-1096 supplemented with both the November 25 transcript and the October 25 and
November 20 petitions for contempt. With the record now supplemented, we order
Sherman to provide this court with a supplemental abstract of the November 25 hearing
and a supplemental addendum that includes the two petitions within fifteen days of this
opinion pursuant to Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 4-2(b)(3). Boeckmann will then have the opportunity
to revise or supplement his brief. Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 4-2(b)(3).
Supplementation ordered.
ABRAMSON and BROWN, JJ., agree.
2
The November 25 hearing transcript was tendered to this court on 27 August 2014,
under case number CV-14-393; the contempt petitions were tendered to this court on 25
February 2015 under case number CV-14-1096. The court denied the motions previously.
That was a mistake, as they should have been granted. The court apologizes for any
inconvenience to the parties related to those denials.
2