Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Nos. 04-15-00493-CR & 04-15-00494-CR
La Quint SULLIVAN,
Appellant
v.
The State
The STATE of Texas,
Appellee
From the 187th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
Trial Court Nos. 2015CR7177 & 2015CR2233
Honorable Steve Hilbig, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice
Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
Delivered and Filed: October 21, 2015
DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION
The trial court’s certification states that “this criminal case is a plea-bargain case, and the
defendant has NO right of appeal.” Rule 25.2(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure
provides that an appeal “must be dismissed if a certification that shows the defendant has the right
of appeal has not been made part of the record under these rules.” TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d). The
clerk’s record contains a written plea bargain, and the punishment assessed did not exceed the
punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant; therefore, the clerk’s
record supports the trial court’s certification that defendant has no right of appeal. See TEX. R.
04-15-00493-CR & 04-15-00494-CR
APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). In addition, appellant’s counsel has filed a letter in which he states that he has
reviewed the clerk’s record and can find no right of appeal for Appellant; counsel concedes that
the trial court’s certification stating the defendant has no right of appeal is correct. In light of the
record presented, we agree with appellant’s counsel that the defendant has no right of appeal;
therefore, Rule 25.2(d) requires this court to dismiss the appeals. TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d).
Accordingly, the appeals are dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d).
PER CURIAM
DO NOT PUBLISH
-2-