| Kamalian v Community OB/GYN Assoc., PLLC |
| 2015 NY Slip Op 07623 |
| Decided on October 21, 2015 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on October 21, 2015 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
REINALDO E. RIVERA, J.P.
RUTH C. BALKIN
JOHN M. LEVENTHAL
THOMAS A. DICKERSON, JJ.
2014-01912
(Index No. 3067/10)
v
Community OB/GYN Associates, PLLC, etc., et al., respondents.
Fabricant Lipman & Frishberg, PLLC, Goshen, N.Y. (Neal D. Frishberg of counsel), for appellant.
Daniels, Porco and Lusardi, LLP, Carmel, N.Y. (Robert C. Lusardi of counsel), for respondents.
DECISION & ORDER
In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of a lease, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Marx, J.), entered November 19, 2013, as, upon a decision of the same court dated August 19, 2013, made after a nonjury trial, is in favor of the defendants and against him dismissing the first cause of action, and in favor of the defendant Community OB/GYN Associates, PLLC, and against him on its counterclaim in the principal sum of $1,188.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
"In reviewing a determination made after a nonjury trial, the power of this Court is as broad as that of the trial court, and we may render a judgment we find warranted by the facts, bearing in mind that in a close case, the trial court had the advantage of seeing and hearing the witnesses" (Zutrau v ICE Sys., Inc., 128 AD3d 1058, 1060 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Northern Westchester Professional Park Assoc. v Town of Bedford, 60 NY2d 492, 499). Where the court's findings of fact "rest in large measure on considerations relating to the credibility of witnesses, deference is owed to the trial court's credibility determinations" (Neiss v Fried, 127 AD3d 1044, 1046 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Gomez v Eleni, LLC, 122 AD3d 797, 798). Here, the Supreme Court's determination that the plaintiff did not accept the modified lease or deliver an executed copy of the modified lease to the defendants, rendering the modified lease ineffective (see 219 Broadway Corp. v Alexander's, Inc., 46 NY2d 506, 511-512), was warranted by the facts. Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly dismissed the first cause of action, which sought to recover damages for breach of the lease.
The plaintiff's remaining contention is without merit.
RIVERA, J.P., BALKIN, LEVENTHAL and DICKERSON, JJ., concur.
ENTER:Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court