Smith v. Thomas

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS May 9, 2003 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III _______________________ Clerk No. 02-20221 _______________________ PATRICK BERNARD SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus TOMMY THOMAS; GARY W. SMIDT, DENNIS W. IVEY; S.E. BAIRD, Lieutenant; GREGORY A. JONES; DALE W. HUBERT; ROBERT RUYLE; DEBBIE CLARK, Nurse Defendants-Appellees. _________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas H-99-CV-3256 _________________________________________________________________ Before JONES and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges, and GEORGE P. KAZEN,* District Judge. PER CURIAM:** Patrick Bernard Smith (“Smith”), Texas prisoner no. 896428, appeals the summary-judgment dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against Harris County, Texas, Sheriff Tommy Thomas; * District Judge of the Southern District of Texas, sitting by designation. ** Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. Deputies Gary Smidt, Dennis Ivey, Dale Hubert, and Robert Ruyle; Lieutenant S.E. Baird; Officer Gregory Jones; and Nurse Debbie Clark. Before the district court Smith alleged, first, that the defendants used excessive force against him following a disciplin- ary violation while he was a pretrial detainee and, second, that the defendants thereafter were deliberately indifferent to his medical needs. For the reasons adequately presented in the district court’s fine opinion, this Court affirms the district court’s grant of summary judgment to the defendants on these two claims. On appeal Smith adds another claim, namely, that his due process rights were violated when he was placed in restraints following his disciplinary violation. Because Smith failed to present this claim to the district court, he may not raise it on appeal. Leverette v. Louisville Ladder Co., 183 F.3d 339, 342 (5th Cir. 1999). Judgment AFFIRMED. 2