United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS May 16, 2003
For the Fifth Circuit
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 02-41654
Summary Calendar
LUANNE MOORE,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
VERSUS
EXXON MOBIL OIL CORPORATION, a New Jersey Corporation,
formerly known as Mobil Oil Corporation,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court
For the Eastern District of Texas, Beaumont
(1:00-CV-839)
Before BARKSDALE, DeMOSS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Luanne Moore (“Moore”) filed suit in the federal district
court against Exxon Mobil Oil Corporation (“Exxon Mobil”) alleging
violations of Title VII as well as a claim for intentional
infliction of emotional distress under state law. Exxon Mobil
answered indicating that Moore was terminated because of “serious
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this
opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under
the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
performance deficiencies” and that Moore had been placed on “a
performance improvement plan” but failed to achieve the necessary
improvement in performance. Exxon Mobil moved for summary judgment
which was granted and Moore appeals to this Court.
We have carefully reviewed the briefs, the record excerpts and
relevant portions of the record itself. For the reasons stated by
the district judge in his “Memorandum Opinion on Defendant’s Motion
for Summary Judgment” filed October 9, 2002, we affirm the final
judgment of the district court granting defendant’s motion for
summary judgment. AFFIRMED
2