TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-15-00619-CV
Keith Wiley, Appellant
v.
Hocutt, Inc., Appellee
FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 201ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT
NO. D-1-GN-14-002465, HONORABLE GISELA D. TRIANA, JUDGE PRESIDING
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant Keith Wiley, acting pro se, filed a notice of appeal attempting to challenge
an order granting summary judgment against Hocutt, Inc., one of the defendants in the underlying
cause. However, that interlocutory judgment does not dispose of all parties and claims in the
underlying cause and no signed severance order appears in the record. Without a final judgment or
an otherwise appealable order, we may not exercise appellate jurisdiction. See Tex. Civ. Prac. &
Rem. Code § 51.014; Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001); see also Cuarto
Petro Corp. v. McGill Real Estate, LLC, No. 04-06-00788-CV, 2006 Tex. App. LEXIS 11023, at *1
(Tex. App.—San Antonio Dec. 27, 2006, no pet.) (mem. op.) (dismissing appeal for want of
jurisdiction because trial court’s order did not dispose of all causes of action and record did not
contain order of severance).
On October 6, 2015, this Court requested that Wiley file a written response
demonstrating this Court’s jurisdiction over his appeal. No response was filed. Accordingly, we
dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a).
__________________________________________
Jeff Rose, Chief Justice
Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Pemberton and Field
Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction
Filed: October 30, 2015
2