J-S22010-15
NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF
PENNSYLVANIA
Appellee
v.
MICHAEL ROMAN
Appellant No. 839 WDA 2014
Appeal from the Judgment of Sentence April 17, 2014
In the Court of Common Pleas of Erie County
Criminal Division at No(s): CP-25-CR-0000029-2014
CP-25-CR-0001311-2013
CP-25-CR-0001314-2013
CP-25-CR-0001317-2013
CP-25-CR-0001319-2013
CP-25-CR-0002074-2013
CP-25-CR-0002115-2013
BEFORE: PANELLA, J., LAZARUS, J., and STRASSBURGER, J.*
JUDGMENT ORDER BY PANELLA, J. FILED NOVEMBER 05, 2015
Appellant, Michael Roman, appeals from the judgment of sentence
entered April 17, 2014, in the Court of Common Pleas of Erie County. We
affirm.
We assume the parties’ familiarity with the facts and procedural
history of this case. In the sole issue presented, Appellant challenges the
discretionary aspects of his sentence. See Appellant’s Brief, at 1.
____________________________________________
*
Retired Senior Judge assigned to the Superior Court.
J-S22010-15
“[I]ssues challenging the discretionary aspects of a sentence must be
raised in a post-sentence motion or by presenting the claim to the trial court
during the sentencing proceedings. Absent such efforts, an objection to a
discretionary aspect of a sentence is waived.” Commonwealth v. Shugars,
895 A.2d 1270, 1273-1274 (Pa. Super. 2006) (citation omitted).
Here, Appellant failed to present this claim at sentencing and failed to
file a post-sentence motion after re-sentencing. Accordingly, we find the
sentencing claim waived.
Judgment of sentence affirmed.
Judgment Entered.
Joseph D. Seletyn, Esq.
Prothonotary
Date: 11/5/2015
-2-