FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION NOV 13 2015
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MARIA L. ROS, No. 13-56300
Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. 3:12-cv-01929-BEN-
WVG
v.
DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST MEMORANDUM*
COMPANY AS TRUSTEE FOR
DOWNEY 2004-AR2; CENTRAL
MORTGAGE COMPANY D/B/A
CENTRAL MORTGAGE LOAN
SERVICING COMPANY; U.S. BANK,
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION; DOES 1-
10, INCLUSIVE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of California
Roger T. Benitez, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted November 6, 2015**
Before: FARRIS, TROTT, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
Maria L. Ros appeals from the district court’s dismissal of her complaint
without leave to amend. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we
affirm.
Ros contends that de novo review by this Court will reveal that amendment
could save her complaint and that the district court’s denial of leave to amend was
therefore improper. However, Ros does not contest any of the district court’s bases
for its dismissal of her claim, nor does she set forth any facts or legal arguments
which she would add to her complaint if amendment were permitted. In the
absence of any argument by which this Court can reevaluate Ros’s complaint, we
cannot say that leave to amend would not have been futile. See Cervantes v.
Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., 656 F.3d 1034, 1041 (9th Cir. 2011).
AFFIRMED.
2