Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-15-00440-CV
Joe GOMEZ and Janie GOMEZ,
Appellants
v.
Thomas L. DASHIELL,
Appellee
From the County Court at Law, Kendall County, Texas
Trial Court No. 15-241-CCL
Honorable Bill R. Palmer, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Marialyn Barnard, Justice
Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice
Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
Delivered and Filed: November 18, 2015
DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION
On June 29, 2015, appellants Joe Gomez and Janie Gomez filed what this court construed
as a notice of appeal from the county court’s June 18, 2015 judgment of eviction. On July 6, 2015,
appellants filed an affidavit of inability to pay costs in this court. Appellants also filed the affidavit
in the trial court with or before the notice of appeal as required. See TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1 (c)(1).
By order dated July 21, 2015, we ordered the clerk of this court to send copies of the affidavit and
our order to the trial court, the trial court clerk, the court reporter, and all parties and/or counsel.
See TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1 (d)(2). We further ordered that anyone who desired to file a contest to
04-15-00440-CV
the affidavit to file such contests in this court on or before July 31, 2015. No contests were filed.
Because no contests were filed, appellants were considered indigent for purposes of this appeal.
Both the clerk’s record and the reporter’s record were then filed in this court. Accordingly,
appellants’ brief was originally due September 11, 2015. However, neither the brief nor a motion
for extension of time was filed.
Based on the foregoing, on September 25, 2015, we ordered appellants to file their
appellants’ brief and a written response reasonably explaining their failure to timely file their brief
in this court on or before October 5, 2015. We advised appellants that if they failed to file their
brief and written response as ordered, we would dismiss their appeal for want of prosecution. See
TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a). On October 4, 2015, by way of informal communication, appellants
notified this court that they would be filing their brief via facsimile. The next day, on October 6,
2015, appellants filed a letter, stating the reasons they failed to file a brief by the original due date
was because (1) they had not received a court order to file a brief by September 11, 2015 and (2)
they had no access to the internet. However, a brief was not filed with the letter.
Accordingly, on October 14, 2015, we ordered appellants to file their appellants’ brief and
a written response reasonably explaining their failure to timely file the brief. We again advised
appellants that if they failed to file their brief and the written response as ordered, we would dismiss
their appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a). We further advised that no
further extensions of time to file their brief would be granted absent written proof of extraordinary
circumstances, and informal communications would not be considered as a substitute for a brief
and written response. Appellants have not filed a brief or written response as ordered by the court.
-2-
04-15-00440-CV
We therefore order this appeal dismissed for want of prosecution. We further order that
appellee, Thomas L. Dashiell, recover his costs in this appeal from appellants Joe Gomez and Janie
Gomez.
PER CURIAM
-3-