UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-1680
ROSS A. FIORANI, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION; ROBERT BERGER; KAREN COMPHER;
FAIRFAX COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT; OFFICER FEIGLESON,
official capacity; SHENANDOAH INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, INC.;
THEMA T. SCOTT,
Defendants - Appellees.
No. 15-1717
ROSS A. FIORANI, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION; ROBERT BERGER; KAREN COMPHER;
FAIRFAX COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT; OFFICER FEIGLESON,
official capacity; SHENANDOAH INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, INC.;
THEMA T. SCOTT,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, District
Judge. (1:15-cv-00667-LO-JFA)
Submitted: November 17, 2015 Decided: November 19, 2015
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ross A. Fiorani, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Thomas R. Waskom,
HUNTON & WILLIAMS, LLP, Richmond, Virginia; Ann Gouldin
Killalea, Assistant County Attorney, Fairfax, Virginia, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
PER CURIAM:
In these consolidated appeals, Ross A. Fiorani, Jr., seeks
to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his civil
complaint and denying his challenge to the removal of the action
from state court. * We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to
proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. Fiorani v. Navy Fed. Credit Union, No.
1:15-cv-00667-LO-JFA (E.D. Va. June 19, 2015). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
*
In Appeal No. 15-1680, Fiorani does not identify the order
he seeks to appeal. In fact, we found no entry of any order
prior to the filing of his notice of appeal. In his notice of
appeal, Fiorani generally objected to the removal of his action
to federal district court, a claim addressed in the district
court’s final order, the subject of Appeal No. 15-1717.
3