TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-15-00616-CR
NO. 03-15-00620-CR
The State of Texas, Appellant
v.
Dennis Davis, Appellee
FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 167TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
NO. D-1-DC-09-900185, HONORABLE P. DAVID WAHLBERG, JUDGE PRESIDING
MEMORANDUM OPINION
PER CURIAM
The State of Texas filed a motion to consolidate its two appeals in the above-
referenced causes. In cause number 03-15-00616-CR, the State referenced its intent to appeal
the district court’s September 10, 2015 findings of fact and conclusions of law regarding Davis’s
motion to set aside the indictment, which were attached to the notice of appeal.1 In cause number
03-15-00620-CR, the State appealed the district court’s September 9, 2015 order setting aside
Davis’s indictment for violation of his constitutional right to a speedy trial.
Davis filed a motion to dismiss in both causes, contending that the court’s findings
and conclusions after setting aside the indictment did not constitute an appealable order
and that dismissal of the first appeal, not consolidation with the later-filed appeal, is appropriate.
1
That notice also made conflicting reference to the court’s order dismissing the indictment.
See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 44.01 (listing orders from which State may appeal in criminal case).
We agree.
Accordingly, the Court denies the State’s motion to consolidate these appeals and
grants in part Davis’s motions to dismiss these appeals. The State’s appeal in cause number 03-15-
00616-CR is dismissed, and its appeal in cause number 03-15-00620-CR remains pending.2
Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Pemberton and Field
03-15-00616-CR Dismissed on Appellee’s Motion
03-15-00620-CR Remains pending
Filed: November 19, 2015
Do Not Publish
2
Davis’s request to strike the second notice of appeal because it was not filed as an
“amended” notice of appeal is denied.
2