UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-7215
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
HAKIM ABDULAH RASHID, a/k/a Rodney Buchanan,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge.
(4:10-cr-00941-RBH-1)
Submitted: November 19, 2015 Decided: November 24, 2015
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Hakim Abdulah Rashid, Appellant Pro Se. Alfred William Walker
Bethea, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South
Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Hakim Abdulah Rashid appeals the district court’s order
denying his Fed. R. Crim. P. 36 motion to correct an alleged
error in the district court’s order granting his 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for sentence reduction. Although the
district court correctly construed the motion as a motion for
reconsideration, cf. Fed. R. Crim. P. 36 (“After giving any
notice it considers appropriate, the court may . . . correct a
clerical error in a judgment, order, or other part of the
record, or correct an error in the record arising from oversight
or omission.” (emphasis added)), because the district court
lacked authority to reconsider its order granting Rashid’s
§ 3582(c)(2) motion, see United States v. Goodwyn, 596 F.3d 233,
235-36 (4th Cir. 2010), we affirm the district court’s order.
See United States v. Rashid, No. 4:10-cr-00941-RBH-1 (D.S.C.
July 28, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid in the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2